Femme Fatale : The mismeasure of women
August 12th, 2006 by foelan" In most intellectual areas, such as
vocabulary and verbal reasoning, the differences between men and women
are statistically insignificant. But the long tail of mathematical
genius does tend to be male, along with higher rates of idiocy and
masturbation. While women show less mathematical brilliance than men,
their scores are better in some verbal skills"
I love this paper so much I wouldn’t comment my my own opinion, tapi artikel ini adalah terusan dari artikel yang hampir sama mengenai wanita yang aku post di blog ini bulan maret lalu, Women in the workforce.
Tulisan dibawah ini adalah versi pendeknya, kalau tertarik untuk membaca lebih, ada versi yang lebih lengkap the mismeasure of women
How women won the sex war
Aug 3rd 2006
From The Economist print edition
Larry Summers may well have been right, but men are done for anyway
ONE of last year’s better entertainments was the Larry Summers show.
The row over whether Mr Summers, the then president of Harvard
University, was right or wrong to say that natural ability may be one
of the reasons why there are fewer female than male maths professors at
Harvard brought pleasure to politically correct and incorrect alike. It
confirmed the prejudices of both about each other, and led to the
downfall of a man beloved by neither.
These differences may or may not be innate, but the argument anyway
misses the point. The interesting question is not whether men are more
likely to be weirdly good at maths than women are, but whether the
things that men are good at are more or less useful than the things
that women are good at. And the answer, in the rich world at least, is
no.
Technology and globalisation are undermining the usefulness of male
skills. Take map-reading. The female tendency to call for five right
turns while holding the map upside down, playing “I spy” with the
children and remarking on interesting features of the local
half-timbering has been attested to over many decades by impartial
scientists as well as by irritated husbands. But once satellite
navigation rendered the ability to tell the cartographic difference
between a car park and a lake redundant, that aspect of male
superiority disappeared out of the window, along with the crucial pages
of the road atlas that the toddler removed while practising his
superior hand-eye co-ordination skills.
Men, studies show, are exceedingly good at rotating
three-dimensional shapes in their head. Perhaps women once stared
open-mouthed in wonder as their mates juggled pyramids of imaginary
polyhedra. Such tricks are also quite handy for engineers who
specialise in building large bits of machinery, digging tunnels or
slinging bridges across rivers. But, now that the rich world has about
as many tunnels and bridges as it needs, and the large bits of
machinery which aren’t made by computers and robots are made by the
Chinese, their usefulness is limited.
Modern professional life is dominated by management, which these
days sets high store by emotional intelligence, empathy and
communication. Wise chaps seeking professional advancement should
therefore spend their free time with groups of women, boning up on how
to undermine somebody’s confidence while pretending to boost it, and
how to turn an entire lunch table against an absent colleague without
saying a mean word. Such skills are likely to have a greater influence
on their lifetime earnings than the ability to spin an icosahedron.
It’s a girlie man’s world, as Arnold Schwarzenegger didn’t say.






















































